• Log In
  • Subscribe
  • Search
  • Log In
  • Home
  • About
    • Editorial board
    • Submission guidelines
    • Peer Review
    • Subscribe to Impact
    • Legal
  • Latest Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Future issues
  • Open Access
  • The Profession 18/19
  • CPD Resources
    • CPD Packs
    • Themed Article Collections
Impact, journal of the Chartered College of Teaching
Chartered College of Teaching
  • Home
  • About
    • Editorial board
    • Submission guidelines
    • Peer Review
    • Subscribe to Impact
    • Legal
  • Issues
    • Special issue 2020
    • Issue 10, Autumn 2020
    • Issue 9, Summer 2020
    • Issue 8, Spring 2020
    • Issue 7, September 2019
    • Future issues
  • Open access

    Open access

    See all
    • Celebrating and supporting the voices and actions of children and young people

      November 2020
    • Can we help improve wider school outcomes through youth social action?

      November 2020
    • Youth social action: What are the benefits for careers education?

      November 2020
  • Browse
    • By category
      • Schools and the wider community: Approaches and outcomes
      • Knowledge, skills, character and values within the curriculum
      • Pupil leadership and pupil voice
      • Social action, character and values
    • By type
      • Case studies
      • Original research
      • Perspectives
      • Teacher reflections
      • CPD Packs
    • By issue
      • Issue 8: Spring 2020
      • Issue 9: Summer 2020
      • Issue 10, Autumn 2020
      • Special issue 2020
    • By tag
      • CPD
      • Early Years
      • Primary
      • Secondary
  • The Profession
  • CPD Resources
    • CPD Packs
    • Themed article collections
  • Popular

    Popular

    NowWeekMonth
    • 92

      Cognitive Load Theory and its application in the classroom

      1
    • 91

      Curriculum: Concepts and approaches

      2
    • 87

      Skilful questioning: The beating heart of good pedagogy

      3

Using peer assessment as an effective learning strategy in the classroom

Stuart BoonJanuary 2020
Strategies to support learning0 Comments8 min read
Photo by Wynand van Poortvliet on Unsplash

If used effectively, peer assessment – a formative assessment strategy that encourages students to comment on the work of their peers – can improve students’ understanding of success criteria, help them to become more engaged in learning and develop their interpersonal skills (Black et al., 2003; Topping, 2017), as well as potentially even reducing teacher workload. Conversely, however, peer assessment can hinder students’ learning if poor-quality, insensitive or unhelpful peer feedback is exchanged, and may strain relationships between learners (Topping, 2017, 2018). The purpose of this article is to examine how these potential issues can be avoided and how peer assessment can be used as an effective learning strategy. 

Training and guiding students to give effective written peer feedback

Guiding students to give effective feedback is important, since they often find it challenging ‘to think of their work in terms of a set of goals’ (Black et al., 2003, p. 49). During peer assessment, learning objectives need to be explicit, and there needs to be clarity around how these can be successfully met (Boon, 2015; Topping, 2018). If students are familiar with success criteria, they can use these to evaluate how far their partner has moved towards accomplishing a learning goal (Min, 2005, 2006).

Feedback should be task-involving, focusing on key elements of the success criteria that have been met and giving details about how the work might be enhanced (Kamins and Dweck, 1999). Guiding students to provide task-involving feedback is more likely to motivate them to learn and make subsequent improvements in their work (Kamins and Dweck, 1999), so research has therefore concentrated on the importance of training learners to provide effective task-involving feedback (e.g. Berg, 1999; Min, 2005, 2006). Several research studies have highlighted the important role teachers play in modelling how to identify strengths and weaknesses in a peer’s work (e.g. Berg, 1999; Min, 2005, 2006). These studies were related to higher education but may still apply to students in primary and secondary schools.

A study focusing on Year 6 children in a primary school also found that training in peer assessment skills helped students to provide focused task-involving feedback (Boon, 2015). The teacher in the study modelled the peer assessment process and gave children time to practise peer assessment on a fictional student, using checklists to scaffold written comments (Min, 2005, 2006; Gielen et al., 2010). These checklists enabled learners to move beyond comments such as ‘You’re really good at this – keep it up!’ to those that referred to success criteria. Whilst interesting, these findings have to be viewed cautiously due to a small sample size and an absence of controls. 

Whilst ensuring that relevant and useful feedback is given, it is vital that students make good use of this too (Gielen et al., 2010). In a study focusing on elementary school peer assessment, children who used peer feedback made more progress in writing than those who had not used it (Olson, 1990). Boon’s action research primary school study (2016a) explored this in more depth and found that students made better use of feedback if it was relevant, if time was given for discussion between peers to clarify misunderstandings, and if students were encouraged to reflect on how the feedback had been used. For example, students were encouraged to say and give examples of how they had used elements of feedback to improve the quality of an information text.

Developing students’ verbal peer feedback

While much research has concentrated on developing written peer feedback (Topping, 2018), students’ use of verbal feedback is also important, particularly in areas such as mathematics, where peer assessment might take place through dialogue rather than a written outcome. Kollar and Fischer (2010, p. 345) suggest that during peer assessment, ‘interactive exchange may be beneficial’ for learning.

Such interaction during peer assessment might involve using dialogue to explore written and verbal comments, and working collaboratively to enhance the products of peer assessment (Kollar and Fischer, 2010). However, Kollar and Fischer’s argument (2010) assumes that students already have the necessary interpersonal skills to interact effectively during peer assessment. This assumption does not sit comfortably with research suggesting that younger students often struggle to work collaboratively (Mercer et al., 2004; Mercer and Sams, 2006). In these cases, peer assessment may become an unmanageable task for students, leading them to use talk in ways that do not support their learning (Mercer et al., 2004; Mercer and Sams, 2006). One such type of dialogue identified by Mercer (2000) has been characterised as disputational talk, where students rigidly adhere to their point of view in discussion and are unwilling to accept alternative viewpoints. A second kind of dialogue that might emerge is cumulative talk, where peers agree with one another’s assertions in an uncritical manner, which again may not be helpful, as students need to be able to constructively examine each other’s work.

However, a third type of dialogue that might be more useful is exploratory talk. This involves hypothesising and reasoning; supporting assertions with good examples; questioning one another; and reaching an agreement based on fruitful discussion (Mercer and Sams, 2006). Students will need guidance in order to use this kind of dialogue rather than disputational or cumulative talk (Mercer et al., 2004). One method of ensuring that exploratory talk takes place is through thinking together, where students are guided to use a set of ground rules for effective communication (Mercer et al., 2004). This involves students asking one another effective questions; reasoning effectively; reaching agreements based on critical discussion and support; and encouraging one another throughout different activities (Mercer et al., 2004; Mercer and Sams, 2006). These ground rules encourage exploratory talk, which shares some features of effective peer assessment. For instance, both exploratory talk and peer assessment involve hypothesising and reasoning (Topping, 2017, 2018).

Black (2007) argues that developing exploratory talk through thinking together is likely to be useful for formative peer assessment because it involves pupils who can reason effectively through discussion (Black, 2007). This argument was supported by Boon’s (2016b) study of effective peer assessment processes in primary schools. This study found that exploratory talk was useful for peer assessment, given that it involves students critiquing ideas effectively, a necessary dimension of effective peer feedback. Boon (2016b) also found that following thinking together, children were able to communicate in ways that supported effective peer assessment. For example, children who had previously engaged in arguments and disputes were able to use talk during a maths activity to assess the ongoing ideas of their partner and drive learning forwards. Having considered how teachers might use peer assessment as a learning strategy to improve the quality of written and verbal feedback, it is now time to offer some recommendations for professional practice.

Recommendations

Peer assessment can be a powerful learning strategy if students are adequately prepared for it and have been guided to develop key interpersonal skills (Black et al., 2003; Boon 2016a, 2016b; Topping, 2017, 2018). For peer assessment to have an impact on learning, students need:

  • training to peer assess effectively, which includes using prompts, checklists of criteria, teacher modelling of how to assess work and regular practice
  • to be given time to discuss and reflect on feedback given to improve work
  • guidance on working collaboratively so that they are able to use talk in ways that enable them to hypothesise, reason and critique. 

References

Berg EC (1999) The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 8(3): 215–241.

Black P (2007) Full marks for feedback. Make the Grade (Journal of the Institute of Educational Assessors) 2: 18–21.

Black P, Harrison C, Lee C et al. (2003) Assessment for Learning: Putting it into Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Boon SI (2015) The role of training in improving peer assessment skills amongst year six pupils in primary school writing: An action research enquiry. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education 43(6): 664–680.

Boon SI (2016a) Increasing the uptake of peer feedback in primary school writing: Findings from an action research enquiry. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education 44(2): 212–225.

Boon SI (2016b) How can peer assessment be used in ways which enhance the quality of younger children’s learning in primary schools? Ed D thesis, University of Leicester, UK.

Gielen S, Peeters E, Dochy F et al. (2010) Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction 20(4): 304–315.

Kamins ML and Dweck CS (1999) Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology 35(3): 835–847.

Kollar I and Fischer F (2010) Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction 20(4): 344–348.

Mercer N (2000) Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.

Mercer N, Dawes R, Wegerif R et al. (2004) Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal 30 (3): 367–385.

Mercer N and Sams C (2006) Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education 20(6): 507–528.

Min HT (2005) Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System 33(2): 293–308.

Min HT (2006) The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 15(2): 118–141.

Olson VLB (1990) The revising processes of sixth-grade writers with and without peer feedback. Journal of Educational Research 84(1): 22–29.

Topping KJ (2017) Peer assessment: Learning by judging and discussing the work of other learners. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology 1(7): 1–17.

Topping KJ (2018) Learning by Peer Assessment: Appraising, Reflecting, Discussing. New York and London: Routledge.

formative assessmentpeer assessmentpeer feedbackPerspectivesverbal feedback

Previous ArticleListen and Respond: evaluating the use of audio feedback
Next ArticleMathematics in the Early Years: What matters?

This Issue

Issue Contents

Cognition, learning and educational research

By Daniel Muijs

Context, mechanism, outcome: How one primary school evaluated the efficacy of teaching strategies in a knowledge-rich curriculum

By JAMES KILSBY

A reflection on how retrieval practice has been used as a tool to improve recall and synoptic thinking in music A-level

By Victoria Waller

Does research on retrieval practice translate into classroom practice?

By Robert Coe

Cognitive load theory and teacher expertise: specific challenges for primary teachers

By Deborah Pope

Expertise Reversal Effect and its Instructional Implications

By Slava Kalyuga

What can cognitive psychology tell us about the challenges of learning mathematics (and what do we still not know)?

By Camilla Gilmore

It’s not all about the retrieval practice!

By Dominic Shibli

The value of a cognitive approach towards values education

By Jonathan Beale

Using multimodality to support cognitive loading in Maths: A Case Study

By Katie Jump

Cognitive Load Theory: A School-Wide approach

By Henry Sauntson

The Bad News and the Good News: Why and How to Teach about Memory

By Tricia Taylor

Misconceptions, p-prims and bridging analogies in Physics teaching

By Gethyn Jones

Mathematics in the Early Years: What matters?

By Helen J Williams

Using peer assessment as an effective learning strategy in the classroom

By Stuart Boon

Listen and Respond: evaluating the use of audio feedback

By Amy Fancourt

Revising opinions about Bloom’s taxonomy

By Christian Bokhove

Supporting autistic girls in schools

By Helen Clarke

Can teaching upper primary about the ‘testing effect’ increase feelings of confidence about test-taking?

By Helen Barsham

Fostering maths fluency with the use of EdTech

By Sara Humphries

More effective teaching through modelling

By Adam Lawrence

Placing Retrieval at the Heart of our Pedagogy and Curriculum

By Amelia Kyriakides

Zipping towards success: workload-neutral strategies to establish a powerful knowledge base for all students

By KATHARINE HUTCHINSON

Targeting the language gap in EYFS children

By Amanda Quirk

Utilising cognitive research as an early-career teacher

By Adam Stubbs

Researching cognitive development in primary schools: methods and practical considerations

By Maria Tsapali

Teaching For Neurodiversity: Training Teachers To See Beyond Labels

By Dominic Griffiths

How to assess claims about cognition and learning: The ACE Concepts

By Lisa-Maria Muller

The explicit use and modelling of cognitive science in staff development

By Liz Barratt

Moving from what we know, to what we know works: How one primary school uses cognitive science in teaching and learning

By David Morel

How we used research to drive school improvement

By Lisa Hickman

Metacognition, self-regulation and self-regulated learning: what’s the difference?

By JAMES MANNION

Improving metacognition through explicit instruction of learning strategies

By Matt Corry

Metacognition: Replicating Lewis’ study at a diverse Nursery School in East London

By Tania Choudhury

A metacognitive approach to improving academic performance and study skills in sixth form students

By Elizabeth Mountstevens

Teacher classroom reflections: tackling flawed metacognition and memory

By Jonathan Firth

Getting the right task to develop metacognition and self-regulated learning in early primary school

By Shirley Larkin

Gender stereotypes and their impact on children’s metacognition

By GEMMA JACKSON

Other Issues

Interim Issue: Evidence-informed Practice Issue 1: Assessment Issue 2: Science of Learning Issue 3: Developing Effective Learners Issue 4: Designing a curriculum Issue 5: Developing a learning culture Issue 6: Broad and balanced curriculum Issue 7: Arts, creativity and cultural education Issue 8: Cognition and learning Issue 9: Learning, leadership and teacher expertise Issue 10: Developing evidence-informed teaching techniques to support effective learning Special All-Schools Issue: 2018 Special issue: Youth social action and character education Special Issue January 2019: Education Technology The Profession 18/19
 logo
Copyright © Chartered College of Teaching 2018